Public market infrastructure

The neutral public rail for capital markets.

Owned by the commons, extracting from no one. The largest gain isn't a faster trade — it's the rail beneath it: atomic settlement that dissolves post-trade fragmentation, corporate actions and disclosure built in, and fair markets where speed buys no advantage. Public infrastructure for the whole life of equity — with the fairness layer proven, not asserted.

1.000Gains-from-trade captured by the batch auction
0Latency advantage — at every news volatility
Cost to paint a fake price
A foundation stewards it a cooperative governs it no one owns it for profit
The problem

The plumbing is owned by the few and priced for rent.

Financial-market infrastructure is a rent-extracting natural monopoly — and below IPO scale, most of the economy has no rail at all.

Monopoly rents

Exchanges, clearing houses, and data vendors enjoy network effects and near-zero marginal cost — and monetize that position hard.

No rail for the long tail

Below IPO scale, 99% of companies can't access listed equity. Raising is bespoke and illiquid; private shares and employee stakes have nowhere to live.

Markets that aren't fair

Continuous trading hands a structural edge to the fastest, and a single trade can paint the price. The same shares trade at different prices in the same instant.

The insight isn't the technology. It's the ownership.

NYSE, Nasdaq, and state-backed exchanges are all tokenizing equity now. We can't win on the technology — and we don't try to. Every one of them is a for-profit vendor, and a vendor can only ever be one option among many. It can never become infrastructure a regulator mandates or a public programme funds, because that would be picking a private winner.

A credibly-neutral commons can be mandated, subsidized, and built upon. The ownership model isn't a constraint on adoption — it is the strategy.

Live proof, 2026. As SpaceX and OpenAI line up to go public, Nasdaq rewrote its index rules weeks before the listing — the press dubbed it "Lex SpaceX" — while retail demand for the private shares routed through SPVs charging ~4% up front + 25% of profits, and vehicles trading at a ~3,000% premium. A for-profit venue can rewrite the market's rules to land a whale; a commons structurally cannot. Capillary wouldn't host these names — it removes the pattern for the markets it serves.

What Capillary is

One neutral rail for a company's whole equity life.

From a single community project to a graduated public company — four pillars, plain and real.

1

Lifecycle infrastructure

One neutral rail for cap table, dividends, votes, and transfers. Cheap, real, low-regulatory — the wedge that lands issuers.

The wedge
2

A fair market

Frequent batch auctions instead of continuous trading: one uniform clearing price per interval, so speed confers no advantage and prices can't be painted with a single trade.

Speed-neutral
3

An always-on backstop

A per-issuer automated market maker guarantees every holder a counterparty from day one — so a thin-name market isn't dead on arrival.

Liquidity from day one
4

A transparency commons — CapCom

Cryptographically-verified, equal-access corporate disclosure — the consolidated data layer Europe lacks, by construction.

Equal access
The evidence

It works, and we can prove it.

We built an open, reproducible market-mechanism simulator — 57 unit tests, validated against textbook competitive-equilibrium theory, regenerated with one command (python -m sim.reproduce). Every figure below traces to results/; none is rounded or embellished.

Run a market

The same orders, cleared two ways. Watch what each mechanism does with them.
Capillary Batch auction

One fair price for everyone, set by supply and demand — not by who was fastest.

Today Continuous trading

The same orders arrive in sequence and match at scattered prices.

1.000

The batch auction is fully efficient

Captures all available gains-from-trade at every liquidity level, across 800 random markets. Continuous trading loses ~20% — even with fully honest traders.

results/validation.txt · experiment.txt
0

The latency advantage disappears

Modelled sniping profit under batching is exactly 0 at every news volatility. Run through a real latency race, the sniper profits in continuous time — and 0 when batched, no matter how fast it races.

results/sniping.txt

Price-painting is structurally impossible

There is no per-trade price to paint: the reference stays at ~100 while a continuous book prints a fake 130. Pegging the price gets ~linearly costlier as liquidity grows.

results/adversary.txt · microstructure.txt

The liquidity dial

The batch auction isn't a small-company feature — it's a graduation feature. Drag from a lone shareholder to a deep market.
Traders in the market8
Batch auction0.70
Backstop / AMM0.70

248163264128256
How it's owned

Built to be uncapturable — because the payers are the governors.

The differentiator. A vendor is one option among many; a commons can be mandated, subsidized, and built upon.

A foundation stewards it

The neutral protocol and treasury — uncapturable and purpose-bound. It guards a security-budget floor so the one real risk, under-funding, can't bite.

A cooperative governs it

Bicameral and identity-weighted across issuers and investors, with no capital-weighted capture. Policy is set by the people who use the rail.

Companies compete at the edges

For-profit service providers compete where competition belongs — at the service edges, on top of the neutral core. Not for the core itself.

A cost-recovery toll at utility pricing — never a percentage of value.

The commons funds itself with a flat per-transaction toll, capped to the treasury's needs, with surplus rebated to participants. Because the payers are the governors, it can't drift into rent.

Grant and blended finance lead the build — the core is never funded by a returns-seeker, so it is never owned by one.

The European case

The neutral rail Europe keeps describing but no one has built.

30+national CSDs fragment European post-trade — against the United States' single DTCC.
3authorizations and negligible activity after two years of the EU's DLT Pilot Regime.
0neutral pan-European rails — savings sit trapped in deposits, dependent on US infrastructure.

Europe's capital-markets problem is structural, not a matter of efficiency. The DLT Pilot Regime proved that tokenized shares mean nothing if they ride the same rails under the same rules.

Capillary is the credibly-neutral commons the Draghi report, the Savings and Investments Union, and the ECB's sovereignty agenda keep describing. We lead with the neutral public post-trade rail: atomic settlement that dissolves fragmentation, programmable corporate actions, and a native transparency layer — integrated with ECB central-bank-money settlement, not competing with it.

Savings & Investments Union Draghi single-CSD agenda ECB strategic autonomy DLT Pilot review LIFE ACCE
Who it's for

One rail, five reasons to build it together.

A validated concept with a complete, reproducible simulation

Build credibly-neutral public infrastructure with us.

A research group

A market-design group for a joint Innosuisse / Horizon application — the keystone partnership for funding and credibility.

Grant & blended finance

Partners aligned with SME capital access, market fairness, and the energy transition. The core is never funded by a returns-seeker.

Founding members

Issuers, brokers, and energy-community developers for Phase-1 pilots — the first names on a neutral rail.